Compare six doctor records and the evidence behind their roles. Learn what a named surgeon, clinic claim and written stage allocation actually establish.
Six records, six different evidence questions
We reviewed six existing directory profiles to show the kinds of evidence a patient encounters. These examples were selected for an editorial update, not as a representative sample of Turkey or a shortlist of recommended surgeons. The table describes what the reviewed source supports; it is not a new credential or a clinical audit.
| Doctor | What the reviewed record contributes | What still needs a booking-specific answer |
|---|---|---|
| Bekir Bek | A clinic-published one-patient and doctor-participation claim | Individual stage operators and the scope of that daily caseload |
| Ahmet Dilber | Dated qualifications and a consultant planning role | Whether he is personally operating in the selected package |
| Doğan Turan | An association biography describing personal implantation | The package, named physician and extraction operator |
| Erkan Demirsoy | A provider statement naming design, extraction and channel opening | Placement responsibilities and the treatment-day team |
| Resul Yaman | A dated clinic biography and named methodology | Which person performs each stage using the described methods |
| Mesut Tomo | A secondary biography with conflicting category fields | Current primary confirmation of workplace and technical roles |
Turn a package into a responsibility map
Use a separate row for consultation, hairline design, extraction, recipient-site creation and implantation. Record a person's full name where it is supplied and their professional role. If the clinic only identifies a team, keep the name field unanswered rather than filling it with the doctor used in the advertisement.
Ask whether the proposed workflow uses a separate channel-opening stage. The terminology can differ between methods, so request a description of the actions as well as a technique name. The purpose is to understand the plan, not to force every operation into an identical sequence.
- Named doctor and treatment address
- Package title and proposed treatment date
- Who performs each action and who assists
- What happens if an operator is unavailable
- Who provides the medical follow-up and how to contact them
Three answers that require a follow-up
If the answer is ‘the doctor supervises’, ask which actions the doctor performs personally and what supervision means during the other actions. If the answer is ‘our specialist team’, ask for the team's professional roles. If the answer is ‘the doctor uses DHI’, ask who does the extraction and who handles the implantation device.
Keep the clinic's answer with the treatment proposal. A verbal response from a coordinator may be useful, but an attributable written answer is easier to compare with the consent and treatment-day arrangement. If the plan changes, ask for the updated allocation before proceeding.
Why the evidence labels matter
A clinic description is useful evidence of what the provider offers. An association biography can support a professional identity or describe a practice. A patient diary records one person's experience. These sources do not have interchangeable scopes: a biography does not independently verify an outcome, and a diary cannot establish who operates on every future patient.
Our role descriptions keep those distinctions visible. A missing stage record means the reviewed evidence has not settled that question. It is not a finding that the doctor is absent, unqualified or incapable.
Use the profiles as case files
The linked profiles below contain the underlying source notes and doctor-specific questions. Read the profile relevant to your consultation, then carry only the unresolved questions into the discussion. A clear answer about one doctor should not be copied onto a colleague's profile merely because both work under the same brand.
Sources used in this guide
- 01Armamed — Erkan Demirsoy
Example of a provider naming specific personal operative responsibilities.
- 02IAHRS — Doğan Turan biography
Professional-directory example describing implantation; not an audit of every package.
- 03Hair Doctors Turkey — research methodology
How the directory separates facts, attributed claims and unresolved fields.
Use it to organize research and questions for a named physician. It does not diagnose hair loss, determine candidacy or replace informed consent and an individual medical consultation.